<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Configure Cisco CallManager Express for Exchange 2007/2010 Unified Messaging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html</link>
	<description>Someday, bringing GoodThings2Life will become a Paradigm!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:54:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html/comment-page-1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 23:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html#comment-55</guid>
		<description>I wish I could help on that, but I haven&#039;t dived into faxing yet, although it&#039;s definitely something I want to do in the future. By the way, I definitely recommend upgrading to CME7.1... as long as you&#039;re a SmartNet member, should be able to download and upgrade at no cost. Likewise for CUE7.1. Quite a bit more stable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish I could help on that, but I haven&#8217;t dived into faxing yet, although it&#8217;s definitely something I want to do in the future. By the way, I definitely recommend upgrading to CME7.1&#8230; as long as you&#8217;re a SmartNet member, should be able to download and upgrade at no cost. Likewise for CUE7.1. Quite a bit more stable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Logannj</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html/comment-page-1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Logannj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 22:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Our current setup is CUCME 4.1 and exchange 2k7 SP1. We have calls and vm working fine to cme. When there is a vm, cme sends email to exchange and user gets vm in mailbox. All we want to add now is just inbound faxes for users on exchange 2k7. Could you post a cme config that will send faxes users get on cme to the exchange server?

thanks for any help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Our current setup is CUCME 4.1 and exchange 2k7 SP1. We have calls and vm working fine to cme. When there is a vm, cme sends email to exchange and user gets vm in mailbox. All we want to add now is just inbound faxes for users on exchange 2k7. Could you post a cme config that will send faxes users get on cme to the exchange server?</p>
<p>thanks for any help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html/comment-page-1#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 16:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html#comment-53</guid>
		<description>In my case it&#039;s on a different IP subnet, so I had to make sure my router and firewall had the appropriate route statements. Also, yes, I have only one Exchange server with all roles installed on it rather than multiple. I plan to add a second server to the mix that will serve as a Database Availability Group for mailbox resiliency soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my case it&#8217;s on a different IP subnet, so I had to make sure my router and firewall had the appropriate route statements. Also, yes, I have only one Exchange server with all roles installed on it rather than multiple. I plan to add a second server to the mix that will serve as a Database Availability Group for mailbox resiliency soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShaunBender</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html/comment-page-1#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>ShaunBender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 14:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Is your Exchange UM server on the same network as CME? Also, do you have all the roles installed on the same server?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is your Exchange UM server on the same network as CME? Also, do you have all the roles installed on the same server?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kbvoip</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html/comment-page-1#comment-34</link>
		<dc:creator>kbvoip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html#comment-34</guid>
		<description>Ok.. Its working now.. Not sure why I had to put a broadcast address for the mwi-server, but here is the configuration for CME 7.1 with Exchange 2010 that works great..

oice service voip
no notify redirect ip2ip
no supplementary-service sip moved-temporarily
no supplementary-service sip refer
sip
 session transport tcp
 header-passing
 no update-callerid

sip-ua
 mwi-server ipv4:255.255.255.255 expires 3600 port 5065 transport tcp unsolicited
 refer-ood enable
 handle-replaces

telephony-service
 mwi relay

ephone-dn  1  dual-line
 mwi sip</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok.. Its working now.. Not sure why I had to put a broadcast address for the mwi-server, but here is the configuration for CME 7.1 with Exchange 2010 that works great..</p>
<p>oice service voip<br />
no notify redirect ip2ip<br />
no supplementary-service sip moved-temporarily<br />
no supplementary-service sip refer<br />
sip<br />
 session transport tcp<br />
 header-passing<br />
 no update-callerid</p>
<p>sip-ua<br />
 mwi-server ipv4:255.255.255.255 expires 3600 port 5065 transport tcp unsolicited<br />
 refer-ood enable<br />
 handle-replaces</p>
<p>telephony-service<br />
 mwi relay</p>
<p>ephone-dn  1  dual-line<br />
 mwi sip</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kbvoip</title>
		<link>http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html/comment-page-1#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>kbvoip</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 03:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aaronhall.net/cisco-cme-exchange-unified-messaging.html#comment-32</guid>
		<description>In response to MWI request with Exchange 2010.  For some reason getting the 481 call leg transaction not exist.  During your setup did you have the same problem?  I&#039;ve followed your instructions, but still doesn&#039;t work.  Tried other changes, but not successful.  I&#039;m running RTM 2010 with CME 7.1.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to MWI request with Exchange 2010.  For some reason getting the 481 call leg transaction not exist.  During your setup did you have the same problem?  I&#8217;ve followed your instructions, but still doesn&#8217;t work.  Tried other changes, but not successful.  I&#8217;m running RTM 2010 with CME 7.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
